
Discovering a County Court Judgment (CCJ) can be extremely stressful, particularly where the judgment was entered without the defendant having the opportunity to defend the claim.
Many individuals first learn about a CCJ when checking their credit report, applying for a mortgage, or receiving enforcement correspondence. In some circumstances, however, it may be possible to challenge the judgment by applying to the court to set aside the judgment.
A common question asked in this situation is:
What are the chances of success in a set aside application?
The answer depends on several legal factors, including whether the judgment was entered correctly, whether there is a real prospect of defending the claim, and whether the application is made promptly.
A set aside application is a formal request asking the court to cancel a judgment that has already been entered.
Most applications relate to default judgments, where the defendant did not respond to the claim in time.
If successful, the judgment is removed and the claim returns to the defence stage.
These applications are governed by Part 13 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR).
In some cases, the court must set aside a judgment under CPR 13.2.
This applies where the judgment was entered incorrectly, for example:
Where service is defective, the court usually has no discretion and must set aside the judgment.
In these cases, the chances of success are generally high.
Most applications fall under CPR 13.3, where the court has discretion.
To succeed, the defendant must show:
The court will also consider whether the application was made promptly after discovery of the judgment.
Courts expect applications to be made quickly once the CCJ is discovered. Delay without good reason reduces the chance of success.
The defence must be credible and supported by evidence. Examples include:
A bare denial is not sufficient.
If the claim was sent to an old or incorrect address, the defendant may not have had a fair chance to respond, increasing the likelihood of set aside.
Courts expect supporting evidence such as:
Courts balance fairness. However, they generally prefer cases to be decided on their merits rather than procedural default.

If granted:
The success of a set aside application depends heavily on timing, evidence, and the strength of the defence. Courts prioritise fairness but expect applicants to act promptly and responsibly.
Tags :
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.